According to UCPR, the main purpose of regulating expert evidence is to:

The main purpose of regulating expert evidence under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR) is to restrict expert evidence to what is necessary to resolve the proceedings. This approach ensures that only relevant and pertinent expert testimony is presented to the court, thereby streamlining the judicial process and preventing the introduction of excessive or unnecessary evidence that could lead to confusion or delay.

By focusing on the necessity of expert opinions, the UCPR seeks to facilitate a more efficient trial process, allowing the court to concentrate on key issues and minimizing the potential for overwhelming the judge or jury with information that does not directly aid in the resolution of the case. This principle helps maintain fairness in legal proceedings by ensuring that both parties can effectively present their cases without the added complication of extraneous expert input.

The other options, while they may touch on aspects of expert evidence, do not capture the primary intent of the UCPR concerning the regulation of such evidence. For instance, ensuring that experts have the right qualifications or encouraging diverse opinions can be valuable in certain contexts, but they do not directly address the necessity and relevance of the evidence in the proceedings themselves. Similarly, aligning expert evidence with international standards may be important in some fields, but the UCPR's main focus is on the