In considering whether to dismiss proceedings, which factor is NOT relevant?

In determining whether to dismiss proceedings, the relevance of each factor can vary significantly. The factor that does not hold relevance, as indicated, pertains to the defendant's previous conduct in similar cases. This is because the dismissal of current proceedings typically centers on the specific circumstances surrounding the case at hand, such as the conduct of the parties in this proceeding, rather than prior actions or behaviors in unrelated cases.

The timeline since a security order was made can indicate delays or obstacles in the proceedings, which may influence the court's decision on whether to allow the case to continue. Similarly, a plaintiff's capacity to finance the further stages of litigation directly informs the viability of continuing with the case. If a plaintiff cannot afford to progress, this can be a significant factor in considering a dismissal.

Lastly, awareness of the dismissal application is pertinent as it affects the procedural fairness and rights of the plaintiff to respond to such applications. Each of these factors engages directly with how the proceedings and the parties' conduct are managed in the current case, highlighting their importance in the assessment, while the defendant's previous conduct in unrelated matters does not impact the specific particulars of the current litigation.