In the case of Treloar Constructions Pty Limited v McMillan, what was the basis for the security for costs order?

The basis for the security for costs order in the case of Treloar Constructions Pty Limited v McMillan was that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence of an ability to pay costs. This situation often arises in civil proceedings where defendants seek security to ensure that they can recover their costs if they prevail in the legal proceedings. When a plaintiff does not demonstrate financial stability or offers credible evidence showing the capacity to cover potential costs, the court may grant an order for security for costs to protect the defendant’s interests. In this case, the court's decision was influenced by the lack of assurance from the plaintiff regarding their financial ability, thereby justifying the requirement for a security for costs order.

Other options do not align with the court's rationale; for instance, demonstrating insolvency or changing the registered office does not inherently support a good reason for ordering security for costs. Similarly, identifying a technicality in the plaintiff's claim does not directly address the financial issues relevant to securing costs. Thus, the focus was on the plaintiff's capacity to cover costs, underscoring the importance of financial evidence in securing such orders.