In the context of freezing orders, what does a "good case" refer to?

In the context of freezing orders, a "good case" refers to a situation where the applicant has established a prima facie case. This means that there is sufficient evidence to indicate that the applicant is likely to succeed in their claim once it is fully heard and determined in court. Establishing a prima facie case requires showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant has a valid legal claim, which justifies the court's intervention, such as imposing a freezing order to prevent the respondent from dissipating assets.

This standard is a crucial part of the legal framework in Australia, as it ensures that freezing orders, which can significantly impact an individual's ability to manage their assets, are not granted lightly or without justification. By demonstrating a prima facie case, the applicant provides the court with the necessary assurance that there is a legitimate dispute that warrants the restrictive remedy of a freezing order.

The other options do not accurately reflect the concept of a "good case" in this context. Winning a case that has been fully litigated, having the potential for appeal, or gathering public interest do not directly relate to the threshold required to justify a freezing order. Therefore, establishing a prima facie case is essential for the court to balance the interests of both