In what scenario does the court have jurisdiction over objections to documents?

Jurisdiction over objections to documents in civil proceedings typically arises when the objections are related to specific procedural requirements that need to be formally addressed. In this context, a Notice of Motion is a critical process used to bring matters before the court, particularly for more substantive objections where certain legal or procedural rules apply.

When objections necessitate a Notice of Motion, it indicates that the opposing party wishes to challenge an aspect of the documents formally within the court's framework. This process allows the court to deliberate on the merits of the objection, which could involve legal arguments and the presentation of relevant evidence. Thus, the court's jurisdiction is engaged because the dispute has escalated to a point where it requires judicial intervention to resolve.

The other options do not align with the formal requirements for court jurisdiction over objections. Personal preference does not constitute a legitimate ground for the court's involvement, as legal objections must be based on sound legal reasoning. Similarly, the age of documents is generally not a factor that determines jurisdiction, nor are technicalities without substantive legal implications. Therefore, the need for a Notice of Motion is fundamentally what grants the court the jurisdiction to address and potentially adjudicate objections regarding documents.