What action can the Supreme Court Court of Appeal take regarding decisions made by the court below?

The Supreme Court Court of Appeal has the authority to remit proceedings back to the lower court as part of its functions when reviewing decisions made by lower courts. Remitting a case implies that the appellate court has determined that there are aspects of the case that require reconsideration or further proceedings by the lower court. This action allows the appellate court to send the case back, often with specific directions or findings that need to be addressed, thereby ensuring that any issues or new legal principles that have emerged during the appeal process can be properly dealt with by the lower court.

This capability is essential in instances where the appellate court finds that a decision may have been made based on a misinterpretation of law or if additional processes, such as a further hearing, are necessary to ensure due process or justice. The concept of remittal also highlights the distinction between appellate review and first-instance hearings, where the latter may require additional context or clarification beyond what was presented during the initial proceeding.

In this context, the other options are not accurate because they misrepresent the powers of the Court of Appeal. The court does not have to always uphold the lower court's decision; it has the discretion to overturn or vary decisions. While it generally cannot introduce new evidence in the appeal process,