What does section 63 state about procedural irregularities?

Section 63 addresses the issue of procedural irregularities in legal proceedings and asserts that such irregularities do not necessarily invalidate the entire set of proceedings. Instead, the provision allows for these irregularities to be amended or set aside by the court. This means that if a procedural error occurs, the court has the discretion to rectify the situation, ensuring that parties are not unjustly penalized for mistakes or oversights that do not affect the substantive rights of the parties involved.

This approach underscores the principle of justice and fairness, allowing courts to focus on the merits of the case rather than on minor technicalities. Such flexibility helps to promote efficiency within the judicial system, enabling cases to be heard based on their content rather than being dismissed solely due to procedural mishaps.

Other options represent less accurate interpretations. For instance, claiming that procedural irregularities completely invalidate all proceedings is overly drastic, as the law aims to prevent unjust outcomes from technical errors. Similarly, stating that these irregularities require automatic dismissal of the case ignores the court's ability to make amends. Lastly, suggesting that irregularities are only relevant at the trial stage overlooks their potential impact on all stages of legal proceedings. Thus, the focus of section 63 clearly supports the idea that amendments can be made