What happens if proceedings are incorrectly commenced by a Statement of Claim under UCPR r6.5?

When proceedings are incorrectly commenced by a Statement of Claim under UCPR rule 6.5, the correct consequence is that pleadings can be treated as filed affidavits. This means that the court allows the documents that were intended to serve as pleadings to be considered for their intended purpose, albeit in a different procedural format. This flexibility is important in civil procedure because it helps maintain the substance of the parties' claims and defenses without undue disruption or the need to completely restart the process.

This provision underscores the principles of justice and efficiency within the legal system. It acknowledges that while procedural rules must be followed, the court often seeks to avoid penalizing parties for technical deficiencies that do not affect the substance of the case.

The options regarding automatic dismissal, the necessity of filing a new Statement of Claim, and restarting the case from scratch do not align with the intent of UCPR r6.5, which aims to facilitate the judicial process rather than hinder it due to clerical or procedural missteps. Thus, treating the improperly filed pleadings as affidavits serves as a remedy that ensures that justice is served with minimal disruption.