What is a potential outcome if costs are found to be disproportionate according to section 60?

In assessing the potential outcomes when costs are found to be disproportionate according to section 60, it is important to understand the implications of cost considerations on the decision to appeal. When costs are deemed disproportionate, it reflects a significant imbalance where the expenses incurred may not align reasonably with the issues at stake or the outcome of the case.

Choosing to appeal can often lead to additional costs, which may not be recovered if the appeal is unsuccessful. Thus, if the costs from the previous proceedings are already disproportionate, this could weigh heavily in a party's decision-making process regarding whether to pursue an appeal. The risk of incurring further costs without a favorable outcome can deter parties from appealing, as they may decide that the potential benefits of an appeal do not justify the additional financial risks involved.

This connection highlights the significance of cost considerations in the appeal process, reinforcing why option B is the correct choice in this context.