What is essential for both parties when submitting an application for judgment after the conclusion of evidence?

The correct answer emphasizes that a trial must have been completed before either party can submit an application for judgment. This requirement is grounded in the procedural framework of civil practice, where a judgment is typically only considered after a full examination of the evidence presented during a trial.

The completion of the trial indicates that all relevant evidence has been submitted, witnesses have testified, and both sides have had the opportunity to present their case. This process ensures that any judgment made by the court is based on a comprehensive understanding of the facts and legal arguments, providing a fair and just resolution to the dispute.

Without the trial being completed, the court would lack the necessary context and information to make an informed decision regarding a judgment. Therefore, this requirement is vital to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. In contrast, the other options present elements that, while important in different contexts, do not align with this specific procedural necessity. For instance, submitting an application in writing is often a formality, rather than a fundamental requirement, and parties' consent or the acceptance of evidence as true are not universally necessary for the application process to proceed post-trial.