Which action is typically NOT a ground for setting aside a judgment?

Setting aside a judgment typically involves demonstrating that the judgment was flawed for specific reasons recognized by law. One of these reasons is if a judgment is entered irregularly or obtained illegally, as both of these points suggest significant procedural errors or misconduct that undermine the legitimacy of the judgment.

Judgments obtained against good faith, meaning they were secured through means that compromise ethical standards, also serve as valid grounds for setting aside a judgment. They point to an improper influencing factor that could affect the integrity of the judicial process.

On the other hand, a judgment obtained with sufficient cause does not constitute a legitimate reason for setting it aside. This is because if there is sufficient cause for a judgment, it means that the judgment is valid and supported by adequate justifications, making it resistant to being challenged on this basis. It signals that the necessary legal and evidentiary requirements were met to uphold the judgment. Therefore, this option is not a valid ground for setting aside a judgment.